Eugene
Weekly 25th Anniversary Issue
What
are We Doing Here?
An introspective look at our unique publication
Starting
the Paper
Silver linings in cloudy times
Thanks
for the Memories
Getting
Readers Excited
Your editor reflects on nearly a decade of reader response
EW
Enviro
Self-Study
And
time goes on, and on, and…
Eugene Weekly Timeline
What
are We Doing Here?
An
introspective look at our unique publication
We boldly asked you readers this fall in the Best
of Eugene ballot what you did and didn't like about Eugene Weekly.
You did respond! Look for the most colorful critiques in our Best
of Eugene issue on Oct. 25. But, for now, your answers so interested
and amused Molly Templeton, our sharp young Best of Eugene editor,
that she urged the oldtimers to explain to our readers what this
free weekly newspaper is all about. What better time than the 25th
birthday of Eugene Weekly?
We bridle a bit at the label of a formulaic "alternative"
newspaper, but we like this description written by staff members:
Eugene Weekly serves the Eugene-Springfield and
broader community with zest, passion and attitude as an alternative
to the mainstream media. We proudly admit to practicing advocacy
journalism with a point of view. The reality is that most media
practices advocacy journalism with a point of view, but the owners
and editors deny it. It's a big difference that we admit to our
biases.
For instance, Fox News labels itself "Fair and Balanced."
A sizeable chunk of America believes that it is. Even The New
York Times, forever proclaiming "All the News That's Fit to
Print," was biased in favor of established power in presenting all
the news that might have stopped the Bush-Cheney rush to war in
Iraq. How many mainstream newspapers and TV channels do you follow
that offer regular sections or segments on labor as well as on business?
Not many. That certainly represents bias in coverage.
Our biases are obvious. We think the environment
is worth protecting. We believe government should be transparent.
We are biased in favor of healthy business and enterprise but against
corporate intimidation, monopolies and bribery. We favor peace and
justice and think war should be a last resort instead of a tool
for oppression. Same goes for police violence. We openly support
well-funded education and social services. We are biased in favor
of sexual diversity and freedom and against bigotry in all its forms.
We view artistic expression as vital to our survival as a species.
 |
| Fred
Taylor |
 |
| Anita
Johnson |
 |
| Art
Johnson |
Another underlying impulse in EW's coverage
is that we do try to look for solutions, to make a difference, even
to lead. Sometimes we succeed. We also fill in the blanks left by
the local daily paper and broadcast news in their often superficial
reporting. In giving so much space to letters, viewpoints, and local
columnists, we try to give voice to a broad, often underrepresented
public. In "Slant" we try to avoid pomposity. Sometimes we fail.
We try to make all of our lives better with the richness of politics,
art, music and culture that this community provides.
The Weekly is a small independent business
fueled totally by advertising. In response to complaints that we
crowd in too much advertising, our ratio of ads to editorial is
about 52/48, consistently lower than the 60/40 or higher ratio of
most print media. We are proud of the high quality of our ads from
our thousands of advertisers, from the smallest classified to the
full-page displays. By the end of 2007, we project that these advertisers
will have pushed our revenue to about $1.7 million. At the end of
August this year, our display ad sales were up 22 percent over last
year, running wildly counter to the national trend. Our revenues,
page counts and readership are growing while other papers are shrinking
in all these categories.
The occasional small profit we have made in the
past has gone straight back into the paper, not to the owners. This
year we hope to give bonuses, improve the health care package, raise
salaries and even replace some funky furniture.
We have 20 full-time employees, dozens of freelance
writers, photographers, cartoonists and interns. And our distribution
team of bicyclists and drivers fills 850 boxes and racks in Eugene
and Springfield, Veneta, Florence, Junction City, Corvallis, Albany
and Salem. Signature Graphics in Portland is printing more than
40,000 papers a week for us, with 42,000 in sight now that UO and
OSU students are back. The Association of Alternative Newspapers
(AAN) ranks EW in the top five of alternative weeklies nationally
for penetration of our circulation area.
More important numbers: According to the independent
Media Audit, 81,000 residents are regular EW readers in Lane
county alone. Thousands more read us in Linn and Benton counties,
and about 35,000 people around the world read us on the web. We
just put up "EW! A Blog" and don't yet have a count on that
audience.
This year our staff won 18 statewide and regional
awards for editorial and design excellence. For the first time in
our 25 years, we won a national AAN award, for Kera Abraham's five-part
series on local eco-arsonists.
EW does not have a publisher. We're "managed"
by a team: Editor Ted Taylor, Director of Sales and Marketing Bill
Shreve, Art Director Kevin Dougherty, CFO Paula Hoemann and part-owner
Anita Johnson. Our weekly managers' meetings are open, sometimes
attracting as many as a dozen staffers. The monthly financial statements
are posted for all staff to peruse.
Owners of EW are: Fred Taylor, retired in
Charleston on the Oregon Coast after a 30-year career on the news
side of the Wall Street Journal, where for 13 years he was
managing editor overseeing as many as 300 reporters; Art Johnson,
Eugene personal injury lawyer and civic activist for more than 50
years; and Anita Johnson, Eugene journalist and activist. Both Anita
Johnson and Taylor are UO journalism graduates.
Remember that you special people, readers of Eugene
Weekly, prompted all these words with your responses to our
"Best of Eugene" ballot. We hope our lengthy response will not dampen
your continued suggestions, criticism, even compliments. That's
what we need to make EW a better paper.
|