
I am currently dating a guy who is nice, funny,
has a good "dating résumé," i.e. never married, good job,
no issues. I have a good time when we are together and he treats
me fine. The problem is that we have the most ridiculously boring
sex. Super vanilla, totally predictable, and I never come. There's
no foreplay, he rarely eats pussy, and when he does it's not good.
It's totally frustrating, but I try not to put too much weight on
it since other aspects of our relationship are ideal.
As a result of this unfortunate circumstance,
I have started to have sex with my ex. He and I have the most incredible
sex. It's kinky, delicious, and the most satisfying I've ever had
in my life. He worships my pussy. He carries a pair of my panties
in his pocket and just knowing this makes me want him even more.
The reason our relationship ended, though, was that he's very committed
to his job, which leaves little room for a significant relationship
(a potential marriage). Thanks to my mini midlife crisis, I think
I fucked up a good thing. I have someone now who I could be in a
committed relationship with, but it's sexually unsatisfying and
suddenly I could give a rat's ass about a "significant relationship."
The question I have for you is this: How much
weight should a person put on good sex in a long-term relationship?
I can't imagine having to masturbate for the rest of my life just
to end up with Mr. Nice Guy. What should I do about this mess?
An Unmarried Woman
How much weight the average person should place
on good sex in an LTR is irrelevant, AUW. The relevant question
is how much weight you should put on good sex in your
LTR. And your slutty, slutty actions of late reveal the answer:
shitloads.
You're dating a nice, funny guy who treats you well—he's
marriage material!—but the sex is so lousy you're cheating
on him with your non-marriage-material ex. So what have we learned
about ourselves in our current relationship, AUW? That you're the
type of person who will cheat on a nice, funny guy if she feels
deprived of good, hot sex. Therefore it would be in your best interest—and
your future husband's best interest—to be with a guy who isn't
merely nice and funny, but also good and hot. Wouldn't you agree?
So here's what you need to do about this mess: Provided
you've told Mr. Nice Guy you're not satisfied, introduced him to
a few of your kinks, and given him pointers on how you like your
pussy eaten, all to no avail, then it's time to dump the motherfucker
already. He needs to find a woman who isn't interested in hot sex,
or thinks the sex he enjoys is hot, and marry her. If you're still
interested in an LTR and your hot ex isn't, you need to stop fucking
your ex and pour that energy into finding a nice, funny man who
is marriage material and great in bed. They're out there.
I'm a 42-year-old gay man with a superhero fetish.
Like a lot of fetishists my age, I assumed I was alone until the
internet came along. I've since met several times with like-minded
guys for costumed roughhousing and bondage. The first time I did
it, it was incredibly hot, but since then, it's felt like something's
missing. Even when they're sexy and friendly, it just feels lacking
somehow. At times, I even feel a bit ridiculous. (Given that I'm
a white-collar professional pretending to be a Lycra-suited crime
fighter, I'm sure it's not much of a stretch to see why I feel silly.)
So my question is this: Am I just being too uptight, or are there
some fantasies that are better left to the imagination?
Part-Time Batman
Some fantasies are better left to the imagination,
PTB, but yours hardly strikes me as one of them. A superhero/bondage
fetish—always a combo platter, thanks to the frequency with
which Lycra-clad superheroes are bound and gagged—is charming
and harmless compared to some other fetishes. But if acting on your
fantasies isn't working for you, PTB, if indulging makes you feel
bad, well, then don't indulge.
I have to say, though, that my superpowers detect
a conflict between the person you are in your everyday life (white-collar
professional) and the person you are in your erotic imagination
(Lycra-clad superhuman), with the former viewing the latter as slightly
ridiculous. Perhaps you'll feel better about acting on your fetish
if you accept that it is a bit ridiculous and reassure yourself
that there's nothing necessarily wrong with making yourself a bit
ridiculous in pursuit of sexual pleasure. Everybody feels a bit
ridiculous after sex, PTB, even if they're not washing spunk out
of their Batman costume. Lighten up and enjoy.
Your advice to Auntie Mame last week is a pristine
example of why I love your column, but I have a quibble! You ended
that column by recounting a tragic death and issuing a stern rule:
"Never leave a tied-up person alone, kids. It's dangerous and dumb."
To quote my little niece, that is SO unfair!
My boyfriend indulges in my love of bondage
all the time. He's got a sweet face and you should see the muscles
on this kid, Dan! They're exquisite, and they look even MORE exquisite
with ropes all over them. Sometimes we add the extra thrill of doing
it outdoors. I have a deck that's entirely surrounded by trees—no
peeking possible—and sometimes I'll tie him to a chair or
a post out there. And sometimes, once I have him secure, I'll take
off—with him feigning outrage and straining to get loose.
When I get back, after taking in a movie or doing some shopping,
he'll still be there, all pumped from his struggling—and horny
as hell! When I let him loose after having left him, the lovemaking
is pyrotechnic.
Are you really going to order me to give that
up, just because two idiots managed to manslaughter somebody?
Sincerely Aspiring For Exemption
I won't order you to give that up, SAFE, provided
you send me some pictures of your boyfriend tied up on your deck.
Nevertheless, it's not safe to leave a tied-up person
alone. What if there's a fire while you're at the movies? What if
while you're out shopping, the boyfriend panics, hyperventilates,
passes out, and falls against the ropes in such a way that restricts
his breathing? What if a rabid raccoon gets onto your deck and chews
his dick off? Tragic scenarios—I've got a million of 'em.
You and the boyfriend are free to decide if the
risks you're running are worth the pyrotechnic sex you're having.
You can take steps to minimize the risks—if he's not hooded
or gagged, for instance, he's at less risk of asphyxiating—but
leaving a tied-up person alone always involves an element of danger.
If danger is part of the thrill, well, you're adults and you can
do what you like. But let's be realistic about the risks and potential
consequences—which can include manslaughter charges.
Oh, and I'm glad you appreciated my advice for Auntie
Mame, who was concerned about how her brother is treating her swishy
5-year-old nephew. But not everyone agrees. To read more letters
about my advice for Auntie Mame—and more letters about drinking
piss—go to www.thestranger.com/savage/mame.
A new Savage Lovecast (my podcast) is available
for download every Tuesday at www.thestranger.com/savage
Questions? mail@savagelove.net
|