
DIVA
and the Downtown
Eugene
needs to come to its senses
BY
JERRY DIETHELM
Something new happened downtown the other
night (Jan. 10) at DIVA. The subject of the forum — downtown
— wasn't new, but the outlook was. It was as though the train
going in the wrong direction had finally left the station, and we
were all left standing on a higher platform rediscovering the basic
principles of a better way. I heard no one express disappointment
that they were not going to Kemper City. That new platform was being
built on art and a triple bottom line sustainability.
Robert Oshatz, an architect from Portland, said,
"Everyone wants to live where artists want to live." He said that
we needed to strive to make our downtown beautiful and better connect
it to the university and the river. Once we made it special, people
with money could play their usual role of driving the artists out
so that they could work their magic elsewhere. Eugene needed to
profoundly come to its senses.
Brad Malsin of Beam Development talked about incorporating
DIVA in the still unfolding Centre Court-Aster's Hole-Washburn Restoration
project. He spoke movingly about the qualities of places he most
admired and the kind of historically sensitive work his firm tried
to do to a room full of affirmatively nodding heads.
I thought again of local architect-artist Scott
Wylie's advice and his brilliant Carlos Scarpa examples (Viewpoint,
9/13/07) that showed how artfully it was possible to blend historic
fragments and new construction. We didn't necessarily have to fully
restore older, too heavily remodeled buildings, such as the Taco
Time Building on Broadway and Willamette, in order to preserve our
downtown history. Building a "temporal collage" in our downtown
could also mean enfolding just the right architectural remnants
and/or recontextualizing significant historic shards within the
architecture of our own time.
Don Genasci, a professor of architecture who teaches
at the UO's Portland Center, spoke about the essential, eternal
civic role of public open space in the life of downtowns. It was
more than just building wide sidewalks or Disney-inspired formulaic
storefronts. His class, like several others before him, had explored
the designing of an urban open space across from the Eugene Public
Library, a popular consensus to emerge from the last election.
Now it remains to be seen if we will apply some
of that thinking to the next round of planning and design for the
area. It would seem civically and profoundly retarded to put out
a new RFP for the Sears property that didn't include a conceptual
plan, showing our community's strong preference for honoring the
library by having a new "whatever" (housing, offices, mix of uses)
clustered around a library park or square next door. A clear civic
commitment here will make development of that hole in the downtown
all that much more attractive — and more whole.
Mayor Kitty Piercy, no stranger to the arts and
the emerging art of sustainability, told the evening's standing-room-only
crowd that she hoped that we could remember how important it was
to listen to each other's stories as we began to build our new story
for downtown. A vibrant city grew out of a dynamic conversation
of many views and voices, she said. Downtown development has certainly
proved to be great theater.
Also discussed briefly was the usual chicken and
egg economics of a downtown trolley. You've heard it before: There
is no present adequate demand for such a service, so we can't afford
to build it. And if we built it, they might not come. Alan Pittman
wrote a good article on trolleys (1/10) that imported useful knowledge
and experience from comparable size communities who have traveled
this path.
But talking about trolleys is to settle too quickly
on a solution before we are clear about the problem or need that
calls such solutions into mind. I see that need as making Willamette
Street into the great street called for in our Downtown Plan. I
see a central dimension of that greatness as being the enhancement
of Willamette's role as a service corridor, linking and moving a
growing density of downtown residents up and down the corridor to
the things they want and need.
Building up our principal north-south corridor would
honor the pioneering investment of the founders of the Tate and
help call into being: a Dotson Building, a Pellitier Towers, a mixed-use
and multistory Newman's, a Chamber Apartments and a Euphoria Place,
and it would stimulate development throughout midtown and South
Willamette. One of the reasons the trolley solution keeps coming
up is that it could slip easily between the present Hult and Hilton
squeeze.
And I'd connect that same service corridor down
5th Avenue to the Market with its proposed new hotel and nearby
riverfront, shift our east-west great street emphasis from 8th to
5th (because 5th leads directly into the EWEB property and the Courthouse
riverfront) and give West Broadway some time to incubate and tango
to its own tune.
Yes, there is always a risk — no chickens
need apply — to public development as well as private. Perhaps
it's time to turn the tables and begin asking for large subsidies
ourselves?
But it was a good evening. And, at DIVA, it became
obvious once again that the central purpose of an economy was to
enable art, that of wine to enhance civic gatherings — and
vice versa.
Jerry Diethelm is a Eugene architect, landscape
architect and planning and urban design consultant.
|