The
Birth of Khan Sheer
beauty isn’t enough to propel Genghis’ story by
Molly Templeton
MONGOL:
Directed by Sergei Bodrov. Written by Bodrov and Arif Aliyev. Cinematography,
Sergey Trofimov and Rogier Stoffers. Music, Tuomas Kantelinen. Starring
Tadanobu Asano, Honglei Sun, Khulan Chuluun and Odnyam Odsuren.
Picturehouse, 2008. R. 126 minutes.
Temudjin
(Tadanobu Asano) with one of his children in Mongol
Russian director Sergei Bodrov’s sweeping, gorgeous Mongol
is enough to make a person want to take a vacation to the Mongolian
steppe, which appears, in the film, to contain multitudes — of landscapes.
From the frozen lake into which young Temudjin (Odnyam Odsuren)
falls (never mind how he gets back out; he just does) to the rocky
shrine of the lord of the skies to which he wanders, head and hands
in a wooden yoke (never mind how he gets out; he just does), this
late 12th century Mongolia is an absolutely beautiful place. It’s
also populated by strikingly beautiful people: Odsuren as the young
boy whose future title we all know, Japanese actor Tadanobu Asano
as his adult self and Mongolian former student Khulan Chuluun as
his beloved Borte all seem to wear their features with a certain
graveness, a stillness and confidence that suits the story of a
legend.
But even a legendary story requires thoughtful telling. Mongol
begins with the future Genghis Khan a nine-year-old boy in search
of a wife and moves gradually though the years to his first major
battle. Unfortunately, this gradual progression is less than graceful.
Time after time, Bodrov cuts away from moments that need explaining
and more than once lets his story rest on a crutch worthy of a Bond
villain: Enemies who want to kill Temudjin simply don’t.
He escapes in that damned heavy yoke not once but twice; neither
freezing water nor arrows in the back can kill this man. When a
former friend takes him as a slave, Temudjin is immediately sold,
a decision which makes little sense unless you read the director’s
comments on how several years in Genghis Khan’s life are unaccounted
for. Here, he spends those years sitting in a cell in a distant
city, on display as a failure until Borte, in a sequence that pushes
even harder at one’s strained suspension of disbelief, comes for
him.
Mongol tries to aim for both the heart and the gut; vibrant
gouts of spouting red blood trade screen time with scenes in which
Temudjin and Borte look longingly at each other. They’re a striking
pair, but as with so many other epic, meant-to-be relationships,
we’ve no real reason to believe in this one. We’ve even less reason
to be interested in it when the film suggests (fairly enough) that
Temudjin is to be praised for choosing to claim Borte’s children,
fathered by different men, as his own — but gives no consideration
to how being kidnapped (and clearly raped) by enemies or selling
herself to a merchant for passage might have affected the nearly
saintly Borte, whose conversations with Temudjin tend to consist
of little more than concern for his well-being.
Still, the film’s greatest hiccup is when it leaps from Temudjin’s
imprisonment to the massed army with which he will fight a defining
battle. How he built this army — how this wandering boy with seemingly
countless enemies, all of whom can find him on the steppe whenever
they feel like it, ever rallied men to his banner — is utterly ignored.
We know what happens to this man; we know he’s going to conquer
half the world, as the film helpfully reminds us at its close. But
what drives a story like this is the how of the thing. Mongol
gives us pieces of the story in flashes and starts, in mentions
of strife between clans, the beliefs which drove Temudjin and a
handful of discussions of what a Mongol is or isn’t. But it’s always
in a hurry to get to the next battle or windswept vista, the next
lingering shot of Borte’s lovely cheekbones or the speeding legs
of elegant horses. All make for a vivid portrait of a land rarely
seen on Western screens — but not, alas, for a compelling take on
the mythic figure at the center of this tale.