Dear Mexican: What is it with Cesar Chavez? Recently in Dallas,
we've gone through three attempts to name streets after Mr. Chavez.
In one instance, the plan was to remove the name of two brothers
who were city founders from a street named after them and rename
the street Cesar Chavez Ave. This is being touted under the banner
of, quote, “recognizing the contribution of Latino culture,” and
“necessary so that we can feel we are respected in this city.”
I've seen streets named after Dr. Martin Luther King
and Mr. Chavez in places that didn't even exist when they were alive.
All in the name of "recognizing the contribution of (insert ethnic
group here).” Just like Wal-Mart and chain restaurants, it is leading
to a homogenization of our culture so every region and town looks
like every other region and town. This totally ignores the contributions
of the local people who REALLY contributed to the LOCAL culture
or its founding Mr. Chavez was critical to the farm worker movement
in South Texas. He was unquestionably, a great American, but what
is the fascination with him? Is he the only Latino who has ever
done anything noteworthy?
Vida en Una Cultura Genérica
Dear Life in a Generic Culture: Your pregunta, while valid,
contains some of the most ignorant observations the Mexican has
seen from a reader since the guy who wondered why Mexicans like
spicy food (same reason why Japanese like fish: people eat what’s
around them). And you’re obviously not a regular reader, as I listed
last year a list of noteworthy Mexicans that included the guy who
co-created the birth control pill and Salma Hayek’s breasts.
Primeramente, a bit of background for non-Dallas readers:
Last summer, city officials sponsored a poll asking residents to
suggest a new name for Industrial Boulevard, a stretch of asphalt
that runs through an area that Big D wants to purty up. The winner,
by an overwhelming margin? Chavez. Politicians summarily ignored
the results, but then offered to rename Ross Avenue after the labor
leader. Businesses and old-timers got upset—the former, because
of the costs associated with a name change, the latter because Ross
was named after two pioneer hermanos (one, whom I might add,
was a Confederate; pardon this unassimilated Mexican, but why would
good Americans continue to want to honor a soldier of the Stars
and Bars?). So far, no Dallas street named for Chavez, and bad feelings
all around.
The opposition’s stated rationale whenever this naming controversy
arises anywhere in los Estados Unidos is similar to yours,
Generic Culture: Chavez had few ties to (insert city or town here),
so why honor him? Besides the fact Chavez did organize quite
mucho in Dallas, such reasoning is laughable. The Mexican
doesn’t lionize Chavez the way others do (as I’ve stated in this
column, he hated illegals and was a bit ethnocentric early in his
career) but his efforts did have a lasting impact on the American
dinner table, unless you grow and harvest your own comida.
Local heroes son fine and all, but Americans also need national
figures around whom we can mythologize—it’s a necessary component
of nationalism. That’s why schools and streets across the country
get named after Clara Barton, Betsy Ross, Jonas Salk and other non-presidential
people even if they never stepped foot in a particular region, and
heaven forbid coloreds want in on the action! After all, it’s not
like Mexicans are asking their gabacho overlords to start
renaming regional landmarks after Pancho Villa—yet…
If white people are allowed to dress like Mexicans for Cinco
de Mayo, as a Mexican, am I allowed to dress up in blackface for
Martin Luther King Jr. Day?
The Don of Capitol Hill
Dear Wab: In your case, yes, just so the cosmos can smile when
some brothers kick your pinche estúpido ass.