The
Naked and the Dead Serenity
and violence during Ireland’s “Troubles” by
Jason Blair
HUNGER:
Directed by Steve McQueen. Written by Enda Walsh and McQueen. Cinematography,
Sean Bobbitt. Music, David Holmes. Starring Michael Fassbender,
Liam Cunningham, Stuart Graham, Brian Milligan and Liam McMahon.
IFC Films, 2008. R. 96 minutes.
Michael
Fassbender in Hunger
When it debuted at Cannes in 2008, Hunger closed to a standing
ovation, but not before a number of people had fled. A film of grueling
beauty, Hunger, which recounts the 1981 Irish hunger strike,
earned the Caméra d’Or at Cannes for first-time director Steve McQueen,
a visual artist hitherto known for gallery films under the influence
of Andy Warhol. Put simply, there is nothing to prepare you for
Hunger. The film is fanatically careful in its depiction
of human suffering, exhibiting the same beatific calm as the dazzling
Let the Right One In. It also is the most stomach-turningly
and gaspingly violent — real flesh-and-bone violence — film in recent
memory, as upsetting and powerful as any movie I’ve seen. Not since
the curb scene in American History X have I felt so challenged
by a film’s total embrace of brutality, although to be clear, Hunger
makes American History X look about as fierce as Reading
Rainbow.
Hunger has three chapters. In the first, we observe a group
of imprisoned IRA members in the Maze, one of Ireland’s most infamous
prisons. To achieve the status of political prisoners, the men engage
in various protests ranging from the passive (smearing their feces,
refusing to be bathed) to the active (head-butting guards), all
of which earn them beatings without mercy. In this segment, the
film focuses on Davey (Brian Milligan) and Gerry (Liam McMahon),
two atrophied cell mates who refuse to wear prison clothing and
who receive instructions from their leader, Bobby (Michael Fessbender),
via tiny messages passed in chapel. The middle chapter is something
of a reprieve, at least on the matter of violence: The 17-minute
scene between Bobby and his priest — in which Bobby reveals the
plan for the hunger strike while the priest, played by Liam Cunningham,
tries in vain to dissuade him — is by far the longest single shot
ever filmed, more than doubling Robert Altman’s eight-minute take
in the The Player. During the verbal clash, their moral philosophies
sizzle and spark; it’s both vital and educational to watch Bobby
defend his effort to end British rule in Ireland. The final, haunting
section of Hunger is Bobby’s hunger strike, which lasts 66
days.
Much of Hunger has the quality of an elegy, a sincere but
distant ode to defiance during a chilling era of history that seems
destined to be reenacted for as long as there are repressive regimes
to enact them. (I’m thinking of the Russian Gulag, not to mention
Guantanamo Bay.) The achievement of Hunger is how personally,
how carefully McQueen and his co-writer Enda Walsh treat these men
and their limited existence. Hunger lingers for extended
stretches on the mopping of hallways, the buzzing of a fly or the
removal of excrement from walls. McQueen seems as interested as
in passing of time as he is in the prisoners’ assertions of dignity.
All of it is powerful; some of it is gratuitous, in particular the
fate that befalls one of the prison guards. Or the cavity searches
the men undergo in which the same pair of gloves probes their asses
and their mouths. I barely made it through Hunger, but days
later, I’m glad I did. The film’s methods are exceedingly effective;
of its message, I’m less certain. If you recreate the violence of
an era with total accuracy, are you doing a service to history or
art?