Keeping Off the Pounds
Flying around mindlessly doesn’t do it
With little sense of sacrifice, I’ve turned down the water heater, switched to florescent lighting and convinced my husband we could survive with one vehicle (mine). I would have no problem keeping off the pounds of carbon dioxide, if not for my pesky proclivity towards plane travel.
My family plans Thanksgiving and reunions a year in advance in order to coordinate the far-flung branches of the family. To gather, most of us have to travel. Oddly, I actually like spending time with my relatives, despite the fact that I’ve moved hundreds of miles away from them.
Growing up soaked in sunshine, I only sometimes love the Oregon rain. Come mid-winter, I get a hankering for warm natural light on my bare skin. Typically, the only way to get sun on more than your face around here is to head east and then risk frostbite by removing an item of clothing for a few seconds.
I was raised with the belief that exploring the globe is the ultimate in pleasure, learning and adventure. Moreover, as a direct descendent of two workaholics, I sometimes struggle to relax at home.
My point? Aside from the blow to my budget, I can drum up plenty of reasons to hop on a plane to a multitude of destinations.
But this past holiday season, we tried a new tack. Because in terms of greenhouse gas emissions, plane travel is just about the most impactful thing any one of us can do. Although I now enjoy line drying my clothes in the summer and count on my daily bike commute to clear my head and move my blood, multiple flights a year shoot my emissions right back up, like a mushroom cloud of carbon dioxide injected directly into the atmosphere, lingering for the next century.
Imagine for a moment that each human being on the planet is only allowed to emit a set level of greenhouse gases, as is under consideration in the UK. Why? Many scientists say that to avoid catastrophic impacts related to climate change, we’ll have to cut our emissions by 65 to 85 percent of current global levels.
If we all make that cut from current levels, Americans’ annual allotment would come out to about seven tons of carbon per person, Brits closer to three tons and your average Indian down to a measly quarter ton. Clearly, a globally equitable cap on carbon emissions would necessitate even more drastic cuts for Americans.
To put these figures into perspective, each passenger can blow a ton of carbon in one round trip flight across the country, with the altitude magnifying the effect of the emissions. The average Oregonian drives 12,000 miles a year, using up more than half of their hypothetical carbon allocation, depending on what they drive and with how many people.
Although our country does not seem politically on the verge of restricting individual greenhouse gas emissions, I feel I’ve got some carbs to cut.
This year I’m in training. Despite requests for visits from friends and family, Steve and I avoided committing to far-flung holiday travel. We checked the weather report and headed out of the rainforest towards the sun, albeit in “the Pug,” our gasoline powered steed. We strapped on snowshoes, enjoyed hot springs, the mountains and high plateau, and spent time with friends close to home.
This leaves me extremely far from perfect, considering an abundance of past travel, and that which I’m sure to do in the future. And, of course, the two of us driving around southeastern Oregon has its own carbon tag. We stayed in much closer range, however, than we would have by plane, and we shared the ride. All told, our collective emissions were about a fifth of a ton, or about 15 percent of what they would have been with our original plan to visit friends and family in Southern California.
Besides, a successful diet doesn’t start with cutting out imported chocolate completely. You start by eliminating those treats you can live without having, like full fat cream in your coffee, or, for Steve and me this year, a pricey flight out of town just for fun.
Sarah Mazze is a recent graduate of UO with double masters degrees in journalism and science (environmental studies).