• Eugene Weekly Loves You!
Share |

EW! A Blog.

December 3, 2007 12:29 PM

Eugene's new taser policy allows police to shock pregnant women if officers decide to.
Here's video of police shocking a pregnant woman in Ohio:

November 30, 2007 05:48 PM

If you don't like the neighborhood speed humps in Eugene, maybe this would be better.

Effective, but I'm not sure how it translates.

November 28, 2007 02:06 PM

Y'know, I really like to blog. I really do, though my numerous excuses as to why I don't blog often enough take up almost as much space as my blog posts. I like to have opinions about things. I have them, oftentimes, whether I want to or not. But there's this thing going around — I think it's called the "holiday season." You know what it does? It eats time. I swear there are currently only 22 hours and shrinking in each day. So all I have are links. They are good links! No, seriously! Come back!

• The U.K. Telegraph has a list of the top 100 living geniuses. Criteria? "Each genius was then awarded scores out of ten against criteria which included: paradigm shifting; popular acclaim; intellectual power; achievement and cultural importance." It's fascinating, screwy and, to no one's surprise, rather man-heavy. Matt Groening above Nelson Mandela? Discuss.

• For Buffy fans, an interview with former writer Jane Espenson, who also has an awesome blog that is full of writing tips that I really ought to make more use of, even though I do not write for TV. They still work. At least some of them. Jane talks a lot about the writers' strike; for more brilliant thoughts on that, there's always Joss Whedon, whose comments I may have linked to before BUT THAT'S BECAUSE HE'S BRILLIANT.

Ahem. Moving on...

• You know who else is brilliant? Carrie Brownstein, who reviews Rock Band for Slate. I have not read this entire review yet, because I wanted to post to the blog. But I plan to. I also plan to make Brownstein's NPR blog, Monitor Mix, regular daily reading. An excerpt of her brilliance:

Since I've gotten older, and probably for the last five years, my relationship trajectory with live shows goes something like this:

1. See listing in local paper or hear about a show from a friend.
2. Think about going to the show, maybe even put it on my calendar.
3. Start listening to the band's music in anticipation of the show.
4. When people ask me what I am doing that night, say that I am going to the show. I am not lying--in my mind, I am really going to the show.
5. Feel tired the day of show and check out what movies are playing.
6. The night of the show, look at the clock and think about what is happening at the show at that very moment.
7. Rent a movie.
8. Sometime in the next week, hear about the show from someone who went.
9. Tell myself I will see the band next time.
10. Find a new show to plan on seeing.

(Dear Carrie, please don't beat me up for quoting all that. It's just that, well, you just wrote MY show-going-or-lack-thereof story, except you left out 6b. Find a strange burst of energy and go out after all. Find that either 6c. The band was totally overrated and I never want to leave the house again, or 6d. The band was fantastic and I can't believe I've ever been so lazy as to stay home on the couch when I could have gone. These are all still followed by 8-10, but the movie will have to find another night to get itself seen. So sayeth the girl who cannot seem to make the most of Netflix.)

Ahem. Er, moving on...

• How to make Terminator movies suck less (seriously, did you see Rise of the Machines)?: Put Christian Bale in them!

• Then, hey, why not give him some of the 50 greatest fictional weapons of all time? Though I've got to point out some serious flaws in this list. The Master Sword (Zelda) is cooler than many, many of the weapons ranked more highly. Buffy's scythe, at #30, is just about right. The teleporting sniper rifle from Deep Space 9 is just stupid and should never have been invented, even fictionally. Sheesh!

The inclusion of the Sword of Omens ("Give me sight beyond sight!") from Thundercats, on the other hand, is effing hysterical. For more Thundercats awesomeness, check out the swear-tastic outtakes, which were honestly among the things that, in the mid-'90s, made me truly understand the magical wonders the internet had to offer.

• More things I haven't read yet, Wonders of the ’90s version: An interview with Wilson Cruz about his groundbreaking role on My So-Called Life and an interview with indie film queen Lili Taylor, who simply rules.

• Is The National's The Boxer better than The Arcade Fire's Neon Bible? Did anyone really, truly like that White Stripes album? Why haven't I heard the new PJ Harvey? It's almost December, kids: Time to start forming your opinions about what didn't suck this year!

(I kid, I kid.)

(Mostly.)

Until next time, your procastinating blogger signs off. Stay tuned for half-formed musings about Why This Year's Oscar-Bait Movies All Are Full of Dicks!

P.S. Credit where it's due: I stumbled upon many, though not all, of these links while reading Whitney Matheson's super-cool Pop Candy Blog. Someday, maybe I'll be cool enough that people will send ME links, and I won't get all my blog content from Whitney and Boing Boing ... oh, and Whedonesque. But I DID already know about Monitor Mix and Jane Espenson's blog. I swear! And the weapons link is a saved one from last week. Srsly.

November 16, 2007 03:11 PM

This 1972 film (in two parts) shows the beginnings of Eugene's bike system—one of the most popular things ever built in Eugene. Some of the film is quaint, but a lot still applies today. In many ways Eugene has come a long way. But in many others we've gone backward, as shown by the footage of the lively downtown and crowds of kids biking to school. Compare the ambitious vision 35 years ago for greener transportation with today's vision:

I-5 Beltline

November 15, 2007 05:32 PM

... it's just that I always seem to be stumbling across mentions of the Fast Computers in big(ger) media outlets. This time, according to a Computers MySpace bulletin, it's Magnet that's caught on to the Computer-ized bandwagon with a nice handful of words of praise. I'll have to find an actual copy to read, 'cause the review (if that's what it is) doesn't seem to be online yet. Go Computers!

If your band gets writ up like this? Tell me! Blog posts, ahoy!

November 15, 2007 01:11 PM

Via Cute Overload, which owns my soul.

November 14, 2007 01:01 PM

No, not that season. What kind of crabby, no-holiday-spirit person do you take me for? I mean truffle season, which must clearly be nearly upon us, as the following two things came to my attention in the last two days:

1. The Oregon Truffle Festival has announced its dates and new location for 2008: January 25-27 at the Valley River Inn. The usual array of amazing-sounding, truffle-centric events awaits your nose and palate, including truffle growers' forums, dinners, wine pairings and more. This year, I totally lucked out and got to go to the Grand Truffle Dinner, which featured course after course of astonishing truffle-involving dishes; I've since forgotten which wonderful chef created which dish, but I think the incredible truffle pear tarte tatin with sour cream puff pastry, roasted hazelnuts and truffle honey ice cream was a Marché creation. Anyway, point is, if you've got a couple hundred dollars just sitting there and you want to spend it on food? You could do worse.

2. Smithsonian Magazine has an article about Oregon truffle guru Charle Lefevre which, possibly thanks to the magical linking powers of Boing Boing, is currently the site's most-viewed story. Nice!

November 14, 2007 06:56 PM

Looking for that triple bottom line?

The Grist website did some muckraking to get the real poop on green toilet paper:

"The bottom line: You can protect your bum without being a bummer for the earth. For maximum absorbency and (guilt-free) comfort, we suggest Seventh Generation double rolls."

Ah, but should we trust a bathroom tissue reviewer named "Grist?"

For the full review and even more scatological puns click here .

TP

November 14, 2007 06:10 PM

KitzhaberKroger

Just after EW went to press with this week's cover story on John Kroger, the outsider hoping to shake up the Oregon AG's office, Kroger announced that he'd been endorsed by former Gov. John Kitzhaber. Read the press release here .

The Kitzhaber endorsement balances the endorsement by current Gov. Ted Kulongoski of Kroger's Democratic primary opponent Rep. Greg Macpherson.

November 13, 2007 01:35 PM

So I can't blog about last night's Heroes episode because the men's basketball game ran long and I haven't watched it yet. Alas.

The game went well enough, I suppose, but these early games are getting a little dull, and the team seems to be a bit all over the place; one night we're bitching about how Malik Hairston seems to have no fire, no spark, and the next he's taking control of the team. One night we think Kamyron Brown is the next best thing to happen to the Ducks, and the next the ball is slipping out of his fingers. It'll be an interesting season — eventually. But these itty bitty games aren't holding my attention as much as I wish they would.

But ANYWAY (tm Klosterman), I came here to type about something else. Something awesome. Something magical. It reminds me of the babe. What babe? The babe with the power. THIS BABE:

Next weekend, starting with a Thanksgiving matinee, the Bijou will be showing Labyrinth — a shiny new print, no less. I almost went to Portland when one of the McMenamins was showing a shiny new Labyrinth print ... but now all I have to do is stay up until 2 am to watch it here. Sweet!

But, er, all self-centeredness aside, you really ought to go see the Most Awesome David Bowie Movie Ever Made (no, The Hunger totally doesn't count). Who cares that Jennifer Connelly never talks about having been in this film, like she's for some idiotic reason ashamed of it? Who cares that a few of the effects are laughably dated? The goblins are awesome. The little worm who invites Sarah in for a cup o' tea is awesome. Everything is awesome except the Fierys, who kind of freak me out. The Helping Hands? ("She chose down? She chose DOWN!") Ludo? ("Smell .... BAAAAD!") Hoggle? Nasty little fairies? My mom erupting into hysterical laughter over the Bowie crotch shot? (Oops, sorry; wasn't going to talk about my experience with this brilliant flick anymore.)

There's just so much to love. And to quote. Labyrinth will be showing LateNite at the Bijou Nov. 23-25 and Dec. 1 & 2 and hey, if you want to make it into some kind of Rocky Horror thing? I'm totally game.

November 13, 2007 03:38 PM

This week Willamette Week featured excerpts from their former reporter's book. Taylor Clark wrote Starbucked: A Double Tall Tale of Caffeine, Commerce, and Culture (Little, Brown and Company, 304 pages, $25.99). Clark got an advance to write the book after he wrote a story for Willamette Week that "examined the charges commonly lobbed at Starbucks and found some of them had scant grounds."

Here's some interesting excerpts from WW's excerpts:

Starbucks makes "$7.8 billion in annual revenues," most of which doesn't make it to the third-world people who do most of the work to produce the coffee.

"The past few years have featured the lowest
inflation-adjusted coffee prices in history—as low as 41.5 cents per
pound, which is far below the growers’ cost of production.
Take a four-dollar cappuccino, for example. According to statistics
from the Specialty Coffee Association of America, only 5 percent of
that price (20 cents) is the cost of the coffee itself—and that’s for
roasted coffee, which the coffeehouse has already paid to cook,
package, and ship. In reality, a nickel more than covers the farmer’s
take for that cappuccino; that’s less than the cost of the cup, sleeve
and lid (7 cents). At a coffeehouse like Starbucks, you’re paying for
dairy products (10 percent, or 40 cents), labor and overhead (71
percent, or $2.84), and, of course, profit (11 percent, or 44 cents).
Upping farmers’ rates significantly would cost the consumer virtually
nothing—but since that’s not how the free market works, farmers are
stuck struggling."

Starbucks has made big bucks off an addictive drug, caffeine.

"Which, depending on your opinions about the issue, would make Starbucks the world’s biggest pusher. The stakes are high for Starbucks in the caffeine debate. Several former and current Starbucks executives told me that they could imagine only one thing that might bring Starbucks down: conclusive scientific evidence that caffeine is unhealthy. If that were to happen, the company would bear a heavy burden; thanks to Starbucks, we’re taking in more caffeine than ever. The company serves the most potent brew in the coffee-house world, which, on a strong day, packs nearly as much caffeine in a single grande cup as three maximum-strength NoDoz caplets."

EW published a review of Starbucked last week here.

Ironically, just as the book came out so did news that Starbucks may have Starbucked itself.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports :

"Dairy prices have skyrocketed, fast-food chains have made it easier
to find a good cup of joe, and traffic in U.S. stores has flattened
amid high fuel prices and turmoil in the housing and credit markets.

Add it all up, and it's dragged the company's stock down nearly 40 percent in the past year....some are wondering if certain U.S. markets have gotten saturated."

Taylor wrote about the "domination" Starbucks has of its market. "Starbucks now owns its market like few other companies in recent
memory. Here’s a challenge: try to name the number two coffeehouse
chain in America. Any ideas?"

Well, actually, Starbucks isn't the #1 place for coffee any more. After Starbucks showed all the money that could be made, that would now be another big corporation—McDonalds. As the PI reports:

"McDonald's has been testing sweet lattes and other espresso drinks in
800 restaurants across the country this year and on Tuesday announced
plans to roll them out nationally over the next two years. The world's
biggest fast-food chain scored big this spring, when Consumer Reports
ranked its premium coffee No. 1, beating Starbucks, Dunkin' Donuts and
Burger King on taste and value."

November 8, 2007 01:27 PM

I lose at blogging.

But Heroes has been losing at TV, to be honest. Uninteresting new characters, unconvincing romances and a scattered storyline are combining to break down my interest, which breaks my nerdy little heart a little. But all is not lost; the show's creator, Tim Kring, recently told Entertainment Weekly that he knows the show's been sucking (my word, not his).

What I think is wrong is a little different, though: It's just not been making sense. Just this week, we had Suddenly Powerful Matt! and Suddenly Stupid Mohinder! — two terrible tastes which do not go well together. A tiny bit of inspiration and Matt understands his powers? A tiny bit of manipulation and Mohinder changes sides, or at least appears to? Please tell me you're kidding.

At least one of the show's sour points has finally come to an end: Hiro is back from Japan. And he's not the only one! (Cue ominous music.) That plotline did nothing but bother me, endlessly, and not least because of its reliance on a princess what needs saving. There is far too much saving of women on your show, Mr. Kring.

Am I repeating myself? Probably. But it's tired, tired, tired stuff to watch over and over again.

What the show does well is build. Last season built toward what could have been a great finale, but then lost its momentum. This season, nothing much has built. Finally, now, we're getting the rebuilding of Peter, the mystery of Elle, the revelation about Adam Monroe (not an iota of surprise there for anyone who read any theorizing, but still fun. And it might be worth noting that now we have an Adam to go with the sadly deceased Eden). We haven't had to suffer through the Wonder Twins and their weak storyline for a bit, which is a relief; I've yet to see them add anything to the show. On the other hand, there's Monica, my new favorite character, who's apparently off training somewhere.

One wonders what will happen when Peter gets that power too.

Anyway, I'm discombobulated from too much to do, but I haven't forgotten about Heroes; I've just forgotten how to blog properly about it. And it's not given me much to work with, lately. I'm almost relieved that this "volume" of the story will come to an end with the December 3 episode, even though I'm worried that this means we won't get satisfactory answers for the mysteries already floating out there. If the entire story of the early generation is "Adam brought us together and then went bad," I'm going to throw things at the TV.

November 7, 2007 03:17 AM

Urban Renewal Defeated
Local vote upsets scheme to divert taxes to developer subsidies

By Alan Pittman

The city of Eugene’s controversial urban renewal plan to subsidize downtown developers with parking garages and other handouts totaling more than $40 million was rejected overwhelmingly by voters on Nov. 6.

In unofficial final results, 64 percent voted no on Measure 20-134.

The defeat came despite proponents outspending opponents by more than a two-to-one margin. Much of the $49,085 proponents raised came from property owners that hoped to cash in on the city’s offers to buy downtown buildings for two to four times their assessed real market value and from construction companies that stood to get contracts for the project. Opponents raised only $20,452, much of it from local businesses threatened with displacement or subsidized chain store competition.

“We were completely outgunned,” said Councilor Bonny Bettman, a leader in the campaign against the measure.

The defeat also came despite strong backing of the measure by The Register-Guard in editorials and, critics say, slanted news stories.

“For this campaign they abandoned all semblance of objectivity,” Bettman said. “It was not just the editorial stance, it was the news stance,” she said. “They basically took the proponents' talking points and reiterated them.”

The R-G repeatedly stated without attribution in news stories that the measure would not raise taxes. But both city finance staff and the county tax assessor wrote that the measure could result in a small tax increase to make up for revenue needed to pay off some existing bonds and levies. Opponents also pointed out that the measure would likely result in larger tax increases as other government services sought to make up for revenue diverted to urban renewal.

The measure’s defeat also came despite the claims of proponents, including all the members of the Eugene 4J School Board, that it would not hurt schools. In fact, about 34 percent of the developer subsidies would be money diverted from state school tax revenue. Statewide, a total of about $165 million a year is diverted for urban renewal.

“I was very disappointed in the school board,” said Councilor Betty Taylor, a former teacher. School board members shouldn’t be arguing that it’s OK for developers to take money from state school funding, she said. “It’s terrible, it’s disgraceful.”

Bettman said it was “scandalous” for the school board members to push to give away school money. “If the school board members think the schools are so flush with money” that they can afford to give it to developers, Bettman said, “they sure shouldn’t have students out there hustling money with candy and wrapping paper” fundraisers.

Taylor said voters saw through the proponents' misleading claims. “It was deceptive, but I think Eugene voters are intelligent.”

The strong vote against tax diversion for developers here could change the future use of urban renewal in Eugene and statewide.

Bettman and Taylor said the city should sunset its existing urban renewal districts downtown and along the riverfront.

Gavin McComas, owner of Sundance Natural Foods and instigator of the 20-134 referral vote, said the city “absolutely” needs to have a vote whenever it expands its urban renewal plans. “I question whether we need to continue with our urban renewal districts.”

Ending the districts could throw a wrench into schemes by city, EWEB and UO staff to use urban renewal tax diversions to subsidize a new City Hall building and massive development of the riverfront and Franklin Boulevard.

Bettman said the city and school district should lobby for a state bill to allow schools and other impacted taxing districts to opt out of having their funding diverted by urban renewal.

“I wish urban renewal statewide could see the light of day,” Bettman said. Describing how the “smoke and mirrors” funding diversion is “bleeding money from schools and essential services,” Bettman said, “urban renewal does not stand up to scrutiny.”

State Rep. Paul Holvey wrote an email just before the election calling for legislative reform of urban renewal.

Lane County Commissioner Peter Sorenson said the county is working on a legislative proposal to allow counties, which lose money from diversion, to get a vote on urban renewal. “We’re optimistic we can get a bill,” Sorenson said.

As for what the city will do now after the defeat of 20-134, Bettman and Taylor said the council should immediately move to approve the Beam Development proposal for remodeling the Center Court with an addition in the adjacent pit and remodeling the Washburne building. The councilors said the city should also move on the T.K. development proposal for condos and retail across from the library and discuss adding a park adjacent to the project. The three projects “would have a big impact,” Taylor said.

The fight for the urban renewal measure has left some lasting damage. The city was “absolutely crazy” to spend $345,000 on now mostly useless options to buy property at unrealistic prices, Taylor said.

Bettman said proponents' false campaign rhetoric that downtown is unsafe will hurt efforts to bring more people downtown. They were “creating their own bad PR,” she said.

But McComas said proponents should “set aside their differences and come together” with opponents to create a “more locally oriented and fiscally responsible way” to improve downtown.

A version of this story was also posted on the Eugene Weekly website here and will appear in the printed paper on Thursday.

November 7, 2007 11:29 AM

The No on 49 campaign warned before the election that if the measure passed:

"If the government wants your property for open space, a scenic view, wildlife habitat, or some other government use, M49 allows them to take your property for free."

After the overwhelming vote for the measure, does this now mean that citizines can add the Wildish Land to Mt. Pisgah park for free? Can citizens now get a park in the Amazon headwaters for free? Can we now seize the timber baron and land speculators' mansions for homeless shelters?

Of course, the timber and land barons that funded the misleading No on 49 campaign may now want to point out the truth: the federal and Oregon Constitutions protect them from property seizure without just compensation.